A lot of hoopla has been going around the internet this past week regarding the iPad. Love it or hate it, the fact of the matter is that Apple has a track record of producing new hardware that rocks industries in such a way that the entire industry changes. The question comes down to then how will the iPad impact music production?

One of the biggest complaints I have seen from people regarding the iPad is that it is not running OS X and while this might seem like a fault at first I actually think it is a blessing in disguise. OS X and even Windows are what I would call “dead” platforms. Not dead in the sense that people will stop using them, but dead in the sense that they have pretty much reached the pinnacle of their development. They are mature and probably won’t be seeing any revolution design changes.

There has also been several complaints about the restrictive nature of the iPhone/iTunes application ecosystem.  Peter Kirn over at CreateDigitalMusic.com. I agree with his sentiment to an extend in so much that the closed fist that Apple has on the App store can be detrimental, but I am not so quick to jump to his side in that open source is the solution. I love open source as much as the next person, but the inherent problem with open source on the whole is that almost all of the products are not consumer friendly. And to be honest the way in which Apple governs its App store has probably not afflicted most consumers in any great impact. In fact it could be argued that Apple’s approval process has been a huge success at keeping the applications on the store and on the iPhone running amazingly well. Regardless though of what you think about that process we will see music production applications come to the iPad. It is safe to say that there will always be a place for those who want more openness to go as well, namely Android.

There is new OS war brewing and in this OS market there is tremendous growth potential for the company that takes it over. Right now the front runners are Apple with the iPhone OS and Google with Android/Chrome OS. What is unique about these OS’s and most of the products that they are running on is that they are middleware of sorts. They are complimentary to your traditional OS. They aren’t going to replace it. You will sync your general media, contacts, documents, etc. on them and chances are sync that back to your “desktop” OS when you are done. The assumption that these platforms are inherently less powerful is entirely the wrong way to look at these platforms in my honest opinion.

So being that they are middleware or complimentary, how do they come into play in music production? Are you going to be running the latest version of Logic Pro or FL Studio on them? Chances are the answer is no, and while that functionality may come with time that is not where its strength is going to lie. Instead think of ways in how these OS’s and devices can link up and also complement your traditional workflow.

If you can break away from the traditional mindset that these devices need to run your existing applications in existing methodologies, their potential grows tremendously, and not just for music production.  Think for a second of the iPad not as the hardware running your DAW but instead  as running or being a control interface for your DAW, or perhaps operating as you would an external synthesizer. May be it replaces your midi controller?

The power of external DSP systems has  proven itself to be useful in music production. The TC Powercore, Muse Reactor, Virus TI, etc. How would your production setup be improved if for example you could run a modular synthesizer just on the iPad, where the DSP processing is handled and it shows up in your DAW as any other VST? Think of how the Virus TI works. The OS on the iPad has such low overhead compared to a traditional OS that you could do DSP offloading applications on it that you perhaps couldn’t do in a traditional OS environment.

Hey Remeber this guy? The Jazzmutant Lemur? It was the “groundbreaking” multi-touch control surface interface that everyone wanted for years, but was just too expensive to own. Well guess, what. Apple just announced a $500 multi-touch control surface.

Wan to know something else? There is already a control interface software that runs on the iPhone/iPod Touch called TouchOSC that utilizes Open Sound Control.

You see where this is going, don’t you? Just look at the plethora of other interesting music creation applications that already exist on the iPhone.

Jasuto

Noise.IO

Inuta

Heck, Even Akai is getting in on the synthesizer creation business and we have also seen how well the Korg DS-10 synthesizer has been received.

The point is I think there is a huge potential here that is going to explode. No, this is not a replacement for your desktop, but were you really looking for that anyways? What is is though is a very interesting piece of hardware (that will only improve in future generations) that developers are going to take advantage of in the near future to produce some crazy good applications for. Just think of what they can do with that screen real estate!!!!

Alright, so we are now a good week into the post announcements for the new Macbook Pros and I suppose everyone has had some time to digest the changes to the hardware. With the new announcements there have been a couple of changes to the hardware that could potentially have a pretty large impact on music producers. Being that Macbook (Pros) make up a pretty good chuck of the producer laptop market, lets take a look at some of those changes.

Unibody Design

Last year’s controversioal decision to have a non-removalbe battery has made its way into the entire Pro line now and it is once again taking quite a bit of heat. For most users people aren’t going to be swapping out batteries, but for the real pro user that is a legitimet concern. The 5 hour expected battery on the 13″ MBP I am sure will end up probably something like 3.5 hours in real life. That being said I can’t say that I actually know another user, including myself who owns more than one battery for any laptop they own.

Addition of Firewire 800

So with the introduction of the new unibody Macbooks a little over a year ago Apple decided to remove the Firewire 800 port on all of the models except for the 17″ model . This was a particulalrly big blow to the platform for creative types since so many of our audio interaces, video devices, etc. connect via firewire for production. It is nice to see that Apple has decided to put this back into the Macbook Pros and also consolidate the entire line into FW 800.

Removal of ExpressCard Slots

Apparently when Apple giveth, Apple must also take away. With the inclusion of the Firewire 800 they have decided to remove the express card slots. While I can’t say that I know many producers who are using the slot, there is a fair number out there who may be running a DSP module or their audio interace off of this slot. This also sort of cuts out a lot of other little advantages to the machine.

SD Card Inclusion

While this might not have an immediate impact for music producers there is quite a bit of hardware these days that use SD cards for sample transfers. With SD cards as cheap as they as well the could also make an excellent solution for storing and retriving sample libraries.

SATA I vs. SATA II

So this one isn’t really a feature as it is a concern that was unearthed a few days ago. Apparently the new Macbooks that are shipping with standard harddrives are shipping with the slower SATA I architecture that caps HDD access speed to 1.5 mbps. Normally that is not such a big deal, but if one were to upgrade their drive to an SSD you would find you have a bottleneck pretty quickly. On the flip side the Macbook Pros that come with an SSD do have the SATA II architecture allowing up to 3.0 Mbps access speeds. This is a disappointing outcome, but I am not sure if it is really a deal breaker for many.

Conclusion

So what seems to be the web’s conclusion on the new Macbooks? Overall the reviews seem extremely positive. It is sort of an intersting take that Apple is going by making the Pro line have three sizes and keeping the Macbook line with the old model style that is only $200 cheaper. One would think that the Macbook is going to fade out entirely in the next year perhaps to something else (netbook? tablet?) the way it is configured now. On that same token though Apple has removed some of Pro features of the books for some more mainstream options. Good for the 90% of users out there, but perhaps not so good for those pro users who really need it. Overall  though it looks like the new MBP line probably wont have any major negative impacts on users, even music producers and I would presume that the accessories market will come to the rescue to provide adequate solutions to the minor niche problems that have arisen out of this transition.

 

Yesterday Apple had their last Macworld address and while the releases were moderately interesting, one of the most controversial  is perhaps the announcement regarding the non-removable battery for the newly announce 17” Macbook Pro. Now, I don’t imagine too many livePA artists are using 17” Pros to do their live performances because lets be honest, the things are huge. But this non-removable battery could very well be setting a design standard that we will all see trickle down into the 15” and 13” models come the next revision.

So in this new Macbook, Apple is claiming to have developed a super long batter that lasts up to eight hours and can have over 1000 charge cycles. Interesting, but I think we all honestly can admit that the real world charge life will last probably around 50%-70% of that claimed by Apple. So, 4-6 hours roughly. While the main crux of this debate and disappointment from many people comes down to the fact that business users cannot change batteries when on a long flight and so forth, I think there is a much bigger and more important issue here that most people are failing to discuss. That issue is of course the lack of accessibility to the internals of the machine itself now.

I personally have never once considered purchasing a second battery for my Macbook and I imagine the vast majority of laptop users out there, even “Pro” users are in the same boat. What I have done though is wanted to upgrade my Macbook as it grew older. Install a new harddrive with a higher RPM, add more RAM, etc.  And while the new 17” Macbook comes packed with a nice 320 GB harddrive and 4GB of ram, this is certainly not the max of what it can handle. A few years down the road even, the cost of putting in a 1TB drive may only be $100, who knows. What Apple has done here though is effectively remove the personal upgrade options of the laptop from the user. No longer can someone really extend the life of their machine an extra few years by adding a bigger, faster harddrive or more RAM. You are now forced to either purchase a new machine or pay the exorbitant amount of extra cost to have the upgrade done at purchase.  We all know that PC manufacturers charge an “arm and a leg” for harddrive and RAM upgrades at purchase.

The upgrade from 4GB of DDR3 Ram on the Macbook Pro 17” to 8GB of RAM costs a whopping $1,200!!!!!!! Admitingly, DDR3 ram is newer to the market and I could not find 2x4GB sticks for sale at either Newegg.com or TigerDirect.com at the time of this writing, but comparable RAM from both of those sites in 2x2GB configurations runs $200 at the most.

This is a slippery slope that Apple has begun to go down with regards to its customers. It is fairly easy to argue that the consumer market either doesn’t care or doesn’t notice these sorts of things, but I for one would like to think that the “Pro” market that all of us as musicians fall into are much more critical and demanding of our hardware.

© 2010 Orju.net Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha